Roextended 4.5 [1.53 only]
Re: ROEXTENDED 2.7 [1.38]
That looks damn great!
Re: ROEXTENDED 2.7 [1.38]
Really looking fine!
System: Windows 11 PRO
Processor: Intel i7-12700KF 5GHZ
Motherboard: Gigabyte B760 DS3H AX
Memory: Corsair DDR5-6000 32 GB
Storage: Samsung 990 M2 SSD + 2 Samsung 870 SSD
Graphics: Asus GeForce Dual RTX 3060 V2 12GB GDDR6
- psychoszoku
- PPM
- Posts: 172
- Joined: July 12th, 2019, 7:25 pm
-
- Posts: 81
- Joined: February 27th, 2020, 2:37 pm
Re: ROEXTENDED 2.7 [1.38]
from the Promods discord channel :)
MandelSoft
Today at 1:54 PM
Basically, RoEx for me is like:
- Romania: Decent, with a few questions
- Ukraine and Moldova: not great, not terrible
- Connectors to Poland and Slovakia: very sloppy.
Terrible in vanilla areas, somewhat good in most of Romania (except the clearly older parts near Suceava), but mostly "meh"
MandelSoft
Today at 1:54 PM
Basically, RoEx for me is like:
- Romania: Decent, with a few questions
- Ukraine and Moldova: not great, not terrible
- Connectors to Poland and Slovakia: very sloppy.
Terrible in vanilla areas, somewhat good in most of Romania (except the clearly older parts near Suceava), but mostly "meh"
Re: ROEXTENDED 2.7 [1.38]
All he has to do is to comment. He is not Romanian and has no idea how many areas in RO-Extended look like reality.
Re: ROEXTENDED 2.7 [1.38]
Well, that surely speaks for itself! And he's one of the heads for a mapping team
that has made a pure mess of their map. Bad leadership I would call it!
that has made a pure mess of their map. Bad leadership I would call it!
-
- Posts: 81
- Joined: February 27th, 2020, 2:37 pm
Re: ROEXTENDED 2.7 [1.38]
Why do you say that, I mean sure, like all maps it has it's areas which are done by less competent people, but for most of the time it still is my "go to" map... Probably we should not even start a discussion which will probably degenerate... Mistake on my part for bringing the Mandelsoft opinion here.
Re: ROEXTENDED 2.7 [1.38]
@black-coffee
To finish up my opinions about this here. Large parts of the map is very good,
and the team members has done a great job. It wasn't that I commented, only
the bad leadership.
To finish up my opinions about this here. Large parts of the map is very good,
and the team members has done a great job. It wasn't that I commented, only
the bad leadership.
Re: ROEXTENDED 2.7 [1.38]
I have no problem with his opinion and if this is based on 2.6 and not 2.7 i can understand.
As a mapper, i need their map for road connections, for the players of Roextended.
As a player i dont use Promods, because, i dont know if someone did the math, but i think almost half of the year or atleast 1/3 of the year Promods is in "we updating the map" status for the players who are using the latest SCS version.
So, i'm not in the mood of downgrading the game or messing my main profile every 2 months.
I want to see the context, where this was posted?
As a mapper, i need their map for road connections, for the players of Roextended.
As a player i dont use Promods, because, i dont know if someone did the math, but i think almost half of the year or atleast 1/3 of the year Promods is in "we updating the map" status for the players who are using the latest SCS version.
So, i'm not in the mood of downgrading the game or messing my main profile every 2 months.
I want to see the context, where this was posted?