Roextended Project

Posted: **June 22nd, 2021, 10:51 am**

Hello,

is it possible that sign_template_board_binding-errors like in the example below come from RoEX?
I checked the folder structure of every map in my combo. I found no according SII-Files.
I have many thousand of these entries for signs.

Only RoEx could not be checked due the archive encription.
The complete LOG can be downloaded via https://drive.google.com/file/d/1pF7H41 ... sp=sharing.

Regards
Karl

Code: Select all

00:00:52.965 : <ERROR> [unit] File '<../../def.scs | >/def/sign/template/gas_de_small.sii':
00:00:52.965 : <WARNING> [unit] The pointer to 'sign_board.54' looks like dangling pointer.
00:00:52.965 : <ERROR> [unit] File '<../../def.scs | >/def/sign/template/gas_de_small.sii':
00:00:52.965 : <WARNING> [unit] The pointer to 'sign_board.55' looks like dangling pointer.
00:00:52.965 : <ERROR> [unit] File '<../../def.scs | >/def/sign/template/gas_de_small.sii':
00:00:52.965 : <WARNING> [unit] The pointer to 'sign_board.147' looks like dangling pointer.
00:00:52.965 : <ERROR> load_unit_tree() - Failed to load unit tree from file (/def/sign/template/gas_de_small.sii)
00:00:52.965 : <ERROR> [unit] File '<../../def.scs | >/def/sign/template/gas_de_small.sii':
00:00:52.965 : <ERROR> [unit] The unit '_nameless.232.9192.ef90' of type 'sign_template_board_binding' has dangling pointer (to 'sign_board.54') in the attribute named 'linked_board'.
00:00:52.965 : <ERROR> [unit] File '<../../def.scs | >/def/sign/template/gas_de_small.sii':
00:00:52.965 : <ERROR> [unit] The unit '_nameless.232.91a4.5070' of type 'sign_template_board_binding' has dangling pointer (to 'sign_board.55') in the attribute named 'linked_board'.
00:00:52.965 : <ERROR> [unit] File '<../../def.scs | >/def/sign/template/gas_de_small.sii':
00:00:52.965 : <ERROR> [unit] The unit '_nameless.232.9192.21e0' of type 'sign_template_board_binding' has dangling pointer (to 'sign_board.54') in the attribute named 'linked_board'.
00:00:52.966 : <ERROR> [unit] File '<../../def.scs | >/def/sign/template/gas_de_small.sii':
00:00:52.966 : <ERROR> [unit] The unit '_nameless.232.91c3.d8f0' of type 'sign_template_board_binding' has dangling pointer (to 'sign_board.55') in the attribute named 'linked_board'.
00:00:52.966 : <ERROR> [unit] File '<../../def.scs | >/def/sign/template/gas_de_small.sii':
00:00:52.966 : <ERROR> [unit] The unit '_nameless.232.91c3.cf90' of type 'sign_template_board_binding' has dangling pointer (to 'sign_board.147') in the attribute named 'linked_board'.
00:00:52.966 : <ERROR> [unit] File '<../../def.scs | >/def/sign/template/gas_de_small.sii':
00:00:52.966 : <ERROR> [unit] The unit '_nameless.232.91c3.d4a0' of type 'sign_template_board_binding' has dangling pointer (to 'sign_board.147') in the attribute named 'linked_board'.
00:00:52.966 : <ERROR> [unit] File '<../../def.scs | >/def/sign/template/gas_de_small.sii':
00:00:52.966 : <WARNING> [unit] The pointer to 'sign_board.54' looks like dangling pointer.
00:00:52.966 : <ERROR> [unit] File '<../../def.scs | >/def/sign/template/gas_de_small.sii':
00:00:52.966 : <WARNING> [unit] The pointer to 'sign_board.55' looks like dangling pointer.
00:00:52.966 : <ERROR> [unit] File '<../../def.scs | >/def/sign/template/gas_de_small.sii':
00:00:52.966 : <WARNING> [unit] The pointer to 'sign_board.147' looks like dangling pointer.

Posted: **June 22nd, 2021, 11:09 am**

Why do you people even donate to this map? Do i have to make a list of things ROEX is blamed for?

Do i need to close this map and this forum?

My friend, you will find those boards in BASE GAME, the name of the file is called boards.sii found in def/sign. As you see, is related to "great" update SCS did changing prices on gas stations from sign to sign template.
Nobody is that stupid to name their boards 1, 2,3 and so on sience SCS invented that.

And second, if you cannot sleep at night about your game log, please play vanilla only, and you will reduce your errors to just a few thousands.
Thank you.

Posted: **June 22nd, 2021, 2:06 pm**

A yes or no would have been sufficient.
Because it was only a question - no reason to react so irritably.

You are right: after this statement I wonder why I should sponsor this.

Roextended Project

Some thousand dangling pointer errors

Some thousand dangling pointer errors

Re: Some thousand dangling pointer errors

Re: Some thousand dangling pointer errors